|
| Register now to interact with over 11,000 members! Registered users have Posting Privileges, free access to Private Messaging, Email Notifications and more. |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Banner size?
Approximately what size should a banner be to fit on a 800x600 resolution. I don't want an incredibly small banner, that's why I went for the 1024x728 resolution. I am at work on a laptop and the 800x600 resolution doesn't look that good on it so any help you could give with suggestions would be nice.
Also, I would like to make this site more interactive, so any suggestions in that way would be great. Thanks. |
|
|
#2 |
|
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: n/a
Posts: 7,294
Reputation: 224
|
If I remember correctly, 780 is the "useable" width for the 800x600 resolution.
Just my "For What It's Worth" |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Home of the free...
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,680
Reputation: 5
|
The most common sizes are 400x40 and 468x60.Just in case you needed to know.................
__________________
Imagination is reality... I'm so smoov,I move to my own theme music. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Drag Racer
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 364
Reputation: 5
|
didn't you ask this a while back T.......were just waiting for someone else to ask it......
![]()
__________________
Ultimate Sand Drag Site http://mwsandracing.com Excellent Web Design and Imagery Site http://www.zldesigns.com |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
780 total?
I changed the size, but it just looks so dinky now.
That's why I wanted a BIG banner on 1024x728. |
|
|
#6 | |
|
Home of the free...
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,680
Reputation: 5
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Imagination is reality... I'm so smoov,I move to my own theme music. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Drag Racer
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 364
Reputation: 5
|
banner size vs. files size
Remember that with a larger banner your file size will be larger too. So for those with 56k may not like the larger banner.
Rule of thumb is page should not exceed 60k total. On 56k this is still about a 10sec download time if not more. Considering most never actually get 56K. Another thought is browser detection to determine if they have 800x600 or 1024x768. then provide the approiate graphic for the resolution detected.
__________________
Ultimate Sand Drag Site http://mwsandracing.com Excellent Web Design and Imagery Site http://www.zldesigns.com |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Mod Squad
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 6,972
Reputation: 243
|
I would cut it down to a total of 775.
I may be a bit smaller...but it willl be quicker and viewable from the majority of visitor resolutions.
__________________
www.GoLightMedia.com |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks Komik...that's sounds like a definite plan. Ok then, anyone know how to implement that?
![]() |
|
|
#10 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Gulfcoast, TX
Posts: 6,911
Reputation: 102
|
cmschool,
Take a look at this. You would need two different pages. http://www.javascriptkit.com/script/cut162.shtml
__________________
Thanks, AlphaDesk Those who can read and don't are no better off than those who can't. - Sam Clemens |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Actually you don't...I found this website and it's working great.
http://javascript.internet.com/user-...ion-image.html |
|
|
#12 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Gulfcoast, TX
Posts: 6,911
Reputation: 102
|
That looks like, just what the doctor ordered
![]()
__________________
Thanks, AlphaDesk Those who can read and don't are no better off than those who can't. - Sam Clemens |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|